What distinguishes non-lethal capabilities from traditional military assets?

The defining characteristic of non-lethal capabilities is their designed purpose to minimize casualties and collateral damage while still achieving operational objectives. These capabilities are often employed to control crowds, incapacitate personnel, or disrupt equipment without causing permanent harm or death. This distinction highlights the ethical considerations of modern warfare, where military forces increasingly strive to conduct operations with a focus on reducing humanitarian impacts, reflecting a broader understanding of the complexities of conflict.

In contrast, options that suggest non-lethal capabilities are less expensive to produce or require advanced technology do not universally apply, as both lethal and non-lethal systems can vary greatly in cost and complexity. Additionally, the assertion that non-lethal capabilities are ineffective in high-intensity conflict overlooks their strategic utility in specific scenarios, such as peacekeeping or counterinsurgency operations, where minimizing aggression while maintaining control can be critical. Thus, the primary focus on minimizing casualties while meeting operational goals aptly captures the essence of non-lethal capabilities in military strategy.